Summer school,
sixth grade. Or these four kids’ ticket to seventh grade—sort of my call, the
principal said. I wanted clarity: “sort of?”, and the principal just shrugged.
He showed me the room we’d have at our disposal, bade a bonne chance, and vanished.
After
listening to the kids’ goals for this imposed opportunity—mainly to see the end
of July—I pointed them to the common need for our first couple lessons:
fractions. They groaned like buffalos.
“So, as I
remember when I was your age,” I proffered, “fractions come down to pizzas and
the people who eat ’em.”
“You tryin’
to be funny?” asked Emil, bespectacled.
“Yeah, how
un-original,” Bryn informed.
“Okay—so
solve this, then: I got seven people who order five pizzas—how many pieces does
each person get?”
Silent
calculation, mostly on my part. “As much as each person wants,” decided Jenny,
and when asked to defend, she reasoned, “it’s just pizza; a piece or two does
the job.” Sigh.
I put a
couple fractions on the white board—5/7 and 7/5 —and asked which one would be
more helpful. As silence shrouded the room, my mind paced a conflicted stage.
“Why didn’t I use even numbers?”, on a practical level, and “What would Mr Kholer
think right now?”, a loathed-to-loved teacher of my far-away maths. He would chalk
more of an equation on the black board, then step back in wonderment: “let us peruse the problem”, as if it materialized
not by his own slap-happy hand. Maybe Mr Kohler would chortle at my remedial
display, suggesting there wasn’t in fact a problem here: 5/7 and 7/5 are nothing
without further variables; maybe that’s what Emil et al were to suss out for
themselves, recalling elementary tools like > or <…
“What kind
of pizza?” queried Brent, apparently attached to Jenny’s idea.
“Why should
that matter?”
“Because,”
Emil elbowed in, “if it’s pepperoni, then the pieces have to give everyone that
much the same.”
“What if
it’s just cheese,” Bryn ventured. “What’s the fucking difference?”
“Hey, hey!”
I needed to admonish, “no swearing at summer school. This is supposed to be
just like sixth grade.”
“I failed sixth grade. Obviously.”
“I failed sixth grade. Obviously.”
“But she’s
right,” Jenny opined. “Pizzas are more than toppings.”
The room
disappeared a bit as my penchant for nostalgia journeyed back to college discussions
on the dichotomy of ‘essence and accident’, the conundrum by which we call a
thing a thing and yet associate that thing with more or less the attributes
that deems the thing a thing. Emil, noting my departure, evidently wanted to
bring ‘things’ back, taking the liberty to sketch on the board a circle with a
outer ring of eight smaller circles and one in the center. “And Tombstone has
even more pepperonis—”
“We’ll get
to each pepperoni in due time,” I adjudicated, “risking the notion that, say,
quattro-formaggi is another can of worms…” Bryn stared death at my dead-pan. “In
the meantime, Jenny, why not get us back on track: seven people want to divide
five pizzas equally. What should we do?”
“I think it
would be easier,” she said, “if five people want to divide seven pizzas. It’s
like you could choose more toppings.”
Damn
straight. I wished the late Mitch Snyder could tag me out at this point. As an
advocate for the homeless, he spoke at a grad school symposium and forthrightly
challenged us to disenroll and start doing something good for the world, a
world which could justly feed itself if more goddamned people had only the
heart and will.
Instead of
Mitch, I resigned myself to realpolitik. “Divide five by seven and you’ll get less
than one. Fractions, then, are always about dealing with the less-than-one.” I
markered above Emil’s poor man’s tombstone: 5/7 < 7/7, which = 1. But the general attention had
eloped to the ether: theirs to the fact that mobile phones and WolframAlpha
would supply math solutions; mine to the memory of Ms Hallahan, who had a sexy
way of teaching reciprocals, flipping fractions like a ballerina.
“What do
you mean?” Bryn invaded. She was totally correct to destroy that recollection,
then and there. “Fractions don’t stop at the one.”
“That’s
thoughtful,” I tried to affirm, winging it shamelessly. “If we, for instance,
say that five people want equal access to seven pizzas—”
“You
started with the opposite,” snarked Emil, “it was seven people for five
pizzas.”
“So it was.
I now know that you—the collective you—are paying attention.” Not entirely
true: Brent had fallen asleep, tuckered out after his inchoate participation. The
bigger problem was hardly shared: where to go next. Emil’s pizza had nine
pugnacious discs to get in the way of carving it clean. Bryn was drumming her
fingers and Jenny was looking out the window, thinking perhaps of her own Mitch
Snyder. I channeled again Mr Kholer and his procedures for how to peruse. My
mind blanked on them, however, preferring instead the procedures of Ms
Hallahan. I was doomed never to leave summer school.
Out of the
blue, Jenny divined: “seven divided by five is seven-fifths. That’s more than
one.”
“But one what?” Emil foraged. “Are we talking
people or pizzas?”
“You are on
the right track.”
“What, for
asking ‘what’?” Bryn bristled.
“For
questioning the numerator and the denominator. The top number—the thing you
start with—divided by the bottom—the parts you end with. Wait—just
checking—yes, that’s right.”
“You’re not
really a math teacher, are you,” Bryn deduced.
I looked
out the window. From some brain cavern the term ‘autodidact’ tried to inform my
premise and purpose (to get them to be), but my vocal chords wisely demurred.
We’d be starting this afternoon The House
on Mango Street, and I knew the narrator Esperanza would be better at
defining difficult things. For now, I let these fractals know, “we learn from
memory.” Then, “will somebody please wake up Brent?”
Daniel Martin Vold Lamken (2018)

No comments:
Post a Comment